Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: TWCDaniele
New Today: 72
New Yesterday: 79
Overall: 149852

People Online:
Visitors: 64
Members: 1
Total: 65 .

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Servicedesk staffing model
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Servicedesk staffing model

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> The ITIL Service Desk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MichaelWeiss
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Nov 09, 2007
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 10:09 am    Post subject: Servicedesk staffing model Reply with quote

I currently manage a 22 person 24/7 SD. All my staff are Tier1, with Tier2 being the operations group on a 24/5 basis. Pretty basic- Tier1 being FPOC for all incidents, Tier2 being the next escalation.

As it stands, the infrastructure in place *today* doesn't readily support Tier1 accessibility to perform the basic system/admin duties to drive expedient closures. Furthermore, my Tier1 staff is approx. 90% green/inexperienced- they are essentially Incident Response (phone/email ticketing agents). Tooling for automation is not quite there either.

I am proposing an operational shift (at least in the grand scheme of this particular company) to the following model:

Tier1 (NOC) grows in functional roles to handle the Top 5-10 current Tier2 issues (i.e. server/service restarts, user management, etc). The current Tier2 staff gets silo'd to specific business unit SWAT teams.

It requires a significant amount of tooling and upskilling of current staff. Due to budgetary constraints I'm working with limited capital.

I'm not going into all details, and I'm aware a lot of this is fuzzy. I'm curious, though, if there's anyone out there who has completed something similar, developed a staffing model they'd like to share, etc.
Back to top
View user's profile
Timo
Senior Itiler


Joined: Oct 26, 2007
Posts: 295
Location: Calgary, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Michael,

in my previous company we had our Tier 1 (service desk) staff perform quite a few activities that would be considered "advanced" for that function. However, it is all a matter of coaching and training and availability of up to date documentation.

The model, or rather an approach, that was adopted was that Tier 2 and 3 will continuously identify issues that could be handled by the service desk, such as restarts, provisioning, accounts, etc... The tier 2 would get an agreement from the management to "outsource" these activities to SD, prepare and conduct training, provide documentation and be available for support for a specified period of time.

Couple of key factors for the success of this approach are:
- eagerness and ability of Tier 1 staff to learn new things (right technical skills)
- Procedures and tools in place to support their ability to execute specific tasks
- Accurate, up to date documentation and availability of Tier 2 to answer questions and provide support during the transition period

Other than that, it's just a matter of persistense Smile

Hope this helps,

Michael
Back to top
View user's profile
jpgilles
Senior Itiler


Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 123
Location: FRance

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 11:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd like to add on this that your tier 1 team is usually staffed to cope with a certain flow of incidents: it happens quite regularly that the incoming flow is lower than the design target; therefore you have available ressources to perform non urgent and back-office type of activities, that will reduce the numbers you would need to staff tier2 if you don't use that possibility.

b.r.
JP
_________________
JP Gilles
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Sarkel
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Apr 24, 2007
Posts: 1
Location: Brooklyn, NY

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey Michael.
It is Nasim.
I see you are all business.
Guess what. I passed my SD Very Happy, Heh, was not preparing at all
When u r in NYC, shot me an email or call, we will have another beer.
_________________
Nas
SarkelIT, Inc.
Back to top
View user's profile
viv121
Senior Itiler


Joined: Dec 15, 2007
Posts: 113

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:50 pm    Post subject: Service Desk Staffing Model Reply with quote

Comments from a newbie

I come from a similar environment where the Service desk was considered technically advanced compared to the others. The Service Desk I worked in used to be the computer administrators, they had permissions on the Active Directory to add users in groups as requested by the end user and approved by the Service Desk manager, they could install all authorised software, were the first line admins of the Blades and the Citrix environment. Also, all the application related password resets were either automated or were done on the fly. Empowering the Service Desk means that the Tier 2 support for the infrastructure and the applications spend their time doing quality stuff and not trivial stuff like password resets or providing Active directory Security group permissions. They should be fixing the bugs and carrying out projects for a robust infrastructure. Ofcourse, it saves a lot of money as well.

The basic skill requirement of a Service desk analyst should be that he should a Microsoft Certified Desktop Technician (MCDST). Funding the course and the certification to the SD staff involves minimal costs. This also ensures that your staff evolves from being an analyst to Microsoft Certified Technicians . Add values. Doesn't it ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Mr_Resistor
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MSDST is a good start on the technical side, but equally important are the soft skills (customer service) Look into HDI Support Center Analyst. (HDI is in Partnership to build the uber help desk tech)

- Jim -
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> The ITIL Service Desk All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.