Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
· Home
· Content
· Feedback
· News
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account


The five ITIL books can be obtained directly from the publisher's website:

Or as downloadable PDFs: HERE

Current Membership

Latest: deannewo60
New Today: 36
New Yesterday: 39
Overall: 230620

People Online:
Visitors: 109
Members: 0
Total: 109



Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Resources

Service related resources
Service Level Agreement

How to set up
IT Change Management
Process Info-Graphic

NOTE: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


Select Interface Language:

Please contact us via the feedback page to discuss advertising rates.

The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Automatic RFC Generation
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Automatic RFC Generation

Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Joined: Sep 28, 2007
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:43 am    Post subject: Automatic RFC Generation Reply with quote

We have an electronic ticketing system in order to request, track, and manage changes. There has been a recent push to automate the creation of RFC requests. For instance, for security patching, there is a request to have the system automatically generate tickets when Microsoft Patch Tuesday comes out. This has spawned other requests where people are asking for tickets to be automatically generated to remind them to do quarterly security permission audits.

Furthermore, there is discussions to have monitoring systems automatically generated RFC tickets if a certain monitoring threshold is reached (however no outage occured, thus no Incident ticket).

I am struggling in the fact that I am not sure if Change Management should be used in this fashion. It appears that the latest trend is to use the process as a "wake-up call", rather than a process that manages the risk associated with implementing changes. Any thoughts?
Back to top
View user's profile
Senior Itiler

Joined: Oct 12, 2007
Posts: 306
Location: Ireland

PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


for things like patching you can end up with lots of changes or "work packages". Sometimes it may be necessary to reduce the admin of manually creating all these items.

If you can do it automatically, you reduce admin. However you still need to have these request logged in time for review and approval beforehand. You should just be reducing admin and not bypassing steps in your CM process.

Also if you do set up an autoamtic way of doing this I will also document the boundaries clearly. Automated RFC's are for x,y and z but not a,b, and c and state that they are still under the change management process and still need approval.

One way to do this is to have a manual change request go through the approval process and generate the individual work packages (patch updates to CI) from that to be attached to the change request prior to it being approved.
Mark O'Loughlin
ITSM / ITIL Consultant
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003

Forums ©


Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.