| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Souljah_boi Newbie


Joined: Jan 09, 2008 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:31 pm Post subject: Sub-service desk within a service desk? |
|
|
Is it ideal or possible to create a sub-service desk within a service desk in a company?
Here is the scenario:
We have a Global Service Desk within our company which serves as the single point of contact for all of our departments.
One of the departments called construction and logistics wants to monitor and assign work orders to their staff in the field internally. So they are thinking if they can use our current tool HP OV OpenView SD but it will have a different database and will be used exclusively for their department.
Is it ideal / possible? any suggestions on how the department can do to assign and monitor work orders to its staff internally?
Your answers would be utmost appreciated. thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UrgentJensen Senior Itiler

Joined: Feb 23, 2005 Posts: 458 Location: London
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Souljah_boi,
This is entirely possible.
In reality what you appear to be providing is system or rather, a service.
Some ticketing tools give you a lot of freedom to creat new views and therefore they are using your services to provide a 'new' application and database, just like you do in other aspects of your daily IT life.
If you have a separate app and database for them then there's no cross over with your Service Desk data. You just need to help them understand how they want to categorise work types, priorities, assignment groups, escalations, reporting... this is starting to sound familiar isn't it?
I've done it on a small scale, where we had separate queues for 'cottage IT' teams who for political reasons had to be kept separate from the main IT department.
Hope this helps,
Urgent |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark-OLoughlin Senior Itiler

Joined: Oct 12, 2007 Posts: 306 Location: Ireland
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
In Openview have you looked at using "Folder" to seperate out the other department. You assign rights to the folder for the people that you want to access the Service Desk data only and then rights to the other folder for the other group. If you have a reporting tool like crystal then this could report from both "environments". Have a look if you ar ok with this or if you need to "restrict" the views in the reporting tool.
Using seperate databases and the same OVSD application servers wont work.
The answer to your question si yes you can have one service desk facilitating many customers on the same or different tools etc. The logistics or "how to" will need to be looked at for all aspects. _________________ Mark O'Loughlin
ITSM / ITIL Consultant |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Souljah_boi Newbie


Joined: Jan 09, 2008 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the wonderful answers you gave..Btw, we are using HP OpenView SD Tool. We are also using folders for example to separate / group some configuration items. As per your statement it is possible.
But my concern is the intended users for the sub-service desk is Construction and Logistics Department. As we all know they are not an IT related department. The main reason that they want the tool is just for the purpose of assigning work orders to their person in the field, and monitor its progress / status.
Is it the right tool? I think it can be useful if there will use the cmdb..
Actually the scenario will be that the department would have an own Global Service Desk which purpose is to assign work order to construction staff in the field. It would be separate from our current Global Service desk which serves as a SPOC for reporting IT related incidents, request etc..
Does the use of OpenView for the construction department is ok? if not, what tools can you suggest?
Thanks so much! Sorry im just new in the field  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UrgentJensen Senior Itiler

Joined: Feb 23, 2005 Posts: 458 Location: London
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Given the scenario you've explained I think you have to stay clearly focused on what you're trying to achieve: you're not providing a 'service desk' service, rather an 'workflow management' service.
So think about these questions:
What are their exact requirements for functionality?
Does HP allow sufficient customisation of views/folders to represent and track the data they want to capture? Some products allow you to change field names and data types and ranges. Think about the impact on backend tables too...
If HP doesn't, have you looked around for construction-specific tools?
If HP does, do you have the money and skills available to do this?
As I mentioned before I did this on a small scale with another product but there's no point mentioning it because you need to really establish all of your customers requirements first and that will include it's operation support and development too.
Good luck,
Urgent |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Souljah_boi Newbie


Joined: Jan 09, 2008 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| UrgentJensen wrote: | Given the scenario you've explained I think you have to stay clearly focused on what you're trying to achieve: you're not providing a 'service desk' service, rather an 'workflow management' service.
So think about these questions:
What are their exact requirements for functionality?
Does HP allow sufficient customisation of views/folders to represent and track the data they want to capture? Some products allow you to change field names and data types and ranges. Think about the impact on backend tables too...
If HP doesn't, have you looked around for construction-specific tools?
If HP does, do you have the money and skills available to do this?
As I mentioned before I did this on a small scale with another product but there's no point mentioning it because you need to really establish all of your customers requirements first and that will include it's operation support and development too.
Good luck,
Urgent |
Thanks for the answers. I really appreciated it. By the way, can I know the tool that you used when you tried it on a small scale? thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UrgentJensen Senior Itiler

Joined: Feb 23, 2005 Posts: 458 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've been told product recommendations are not allowed on this site, which I completely understand (ironic as recently a lot of people are asking about products now!).
Even if I were able to tell you what I used there we some serious downsides to using that company and therefore I'd probably not use them again!
Best to check Gartner/Forester for 'best fit' products that allow plenty of customisation. There's no silver bullet though as 'customisation' can translate into 'resource intensive'.
What I can say is that if you want multiple databases then go for something that uses a straightforward SQL type backend so it's simple enough to configure users pc's subject to what they need to see.
Good luck,
Urgent |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UKVIKING Senior Itiler

Joined: Sep 16, 2006 Posts: 3115 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UrgentJensen
It is one thing to say... i have used this tool - insert name - i felt it met my needs when a question about a tool comes up
it is another to say
'Use insert name to solve your itil problem' I did
The first is an opinion based on someone ELSE asking for it. Some other posted asked what the forum people thinks of a tool etc...
That's opinion
the other is advertising/spam/ etc
The latter is frowned upon
The former should not be...
There is a fine line between opinion and being a shill for a product
Frank while he has a company/product tries his best not to shill his own product... he does a pretty good job - most of the time. (grin) _________________ John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)
Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UrgentJensen Senior Itiler

Joined: Feb 23, 2005 Posts: 458 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
John,
I posted a product name into a post suggesting it suited my needs and it was removed and I got a stern email from the moderator...
UJ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ITILadmin Senior Itiler

Joined: Oct 19, 2004 Posts: 163
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| UrgentJensen wrote: | John,
I posted a product name into a post suggesting it suited my needs and it was removed and I got a stern email from the moderator...
UJ |
Because it sounded like an advert.
John's post above calls it absolutely correctly.
You may have even posted a link, which would definitely be chopped.
Please understand the time we spend keeping spammers at bay. If we didn't, this forum would be like so many others. The rules have served us very well, enabling information sharing and discussion yet deterring the link spammers and ad guys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UKVIKING Senior Itiler

Joined: Sep 16, 2006 Posts: 3115 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And I think I called it spam too !!!
or was it another post _________________ John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)
Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Souljah_boi Newbie


Joined: Jan 09, 2008 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for all the answers. I really appreciated. With regards to the products. My apologies ITILadmin I will gonna check the requirements so we could evaluate if the tool will be suited or be customized based on the needs of the customer..tnx a lot! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|