Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: Rolandmugs
New Today: 24
New Yesterday: 83
Overall: 141546

People Online:
Visitors: 89
Members: 1
Total: 90 .

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - A quick question from a newbie
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

A quick question from a newbie

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Problem Management
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
AVillan
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jul 17, 2008
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:42 am    Post subject: A quick question from a newbie Reply with quote

Hi all,

Great website, some very useful articles to help me on my way up the ladder.

I need help is resting an argument. At the moment its me V my manager and my know it all colleague.

Basically, we have had a incident flagged as a possible problem, upon further investigation into it, a 3rd party has already got a known error in place and has a permanent solution in the next software patch.

Should we still raise this as a problem even thou it is known error status, or simply put, should all known errors have a problem record behind them.

According to ITIL, all known errors should remain a problem until a permanent fix is supplied.

Can someone please help me clear this mess up before I let the tyres down on my colleagues car!!!!

I look forward to the responses!!

Lou
Back to top
View user's profile
Diarmid
Senior Itiler


Joined: Mar 04, 2008
Posts: 1884
Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Lou.

It is very simple. If something is causing incidents or has the potential to cause incidents or otherwise degrade your services, then it is a problem until fixed.

Documenting a known error, supplying a workaround and predicting the date on which it will be resolved does not change the fact that you have a problem.

One obvious reason why this is true is that you cannot be certain that the predicted fix will in fact work as required for you.

A problem is a problem until formally signed off as not a problem.
_________________
"Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
m_croon
Senior Itiler


Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 262
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What Diarmid is saying+ you are actually giving the problemrecord a (lifecycle) status: problem, known error, RFC pending, closed.

Regards,

Michiel
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Problem Management All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.