For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone
Note: ® ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:46 pm Post subject: ITIL and SLAs
Does ITIL specify any of the SLAs say a P1 ticket's response time should be <15 mins and Resolution has to be <4 hours and anything else similar to this as a benchmark?
If yes, is this listed anywhere one could read through.
Itil is a best practice, its not a standard. It should be tailored upon your requirements. So as the SLA. The Service Level Manager AKA client Manager AKA.... should sit down with the client take their requirements and then check if those targets are achievable by IT. "Negotiate and agree"
For Example: My SLA say that a p1 ticket response time is <15minutes where as Diarmid's SLA says that a p1 < 24hours, either because his short on staff and doesnt have the resource capacity to respond within 15minutes or the customer requirements is like that.
What im trying to say Guata, ITIL doesnt tell you what the response time for an SLA, it should be tailored to your company. _________________ Ali Makahleh
Configuration Management Certificate (Blue Badge)
IT Service Management Certificate (Red Badge)
“If you can't describe what you are doing as a process, you don't know what you're doing." W. Edwards Deming.
Joined: Mar 04, 2008 Posts: 1270 Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:58 pm Post subject:
Well mine would actually say you can't have a resolution time on a single incident, but I'll give you a rolling average.
And it definitely will not be less for a high priority incident than a low priority incident because I have no evidence that high priority incidents are easier and quicker to resolve than any others. I will say that high priority incidents will get treated before low priority incidents.
If you insist on resolution time for individual incidents, then I will say that your SLA is only breached if more than four exceed that time in a month. Otherwise the resolution time agreed will be so long that it will not be applying pressure to my staff for most incidents. _________________ "Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
Joined: Mar 04, 2008 Posts: 1270 Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 10:07 pm Post subject:
.... sorry still thinking.
I will certainly consider having different agreements for different systems or even for different kinds of incidents if that looks practical.
ITIL does not actually insist that incident resolution times be included in an SLA. In fact it does not insist on anything.
In some circumstances you can have a perfectly adequate agreement that focuses on availability and frequency of service interruptions and lets you get on with treating each incident on its merit, putting commensurate resource into its resolution and concentrating on getting service back as soon as is practicable. _________________ "Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum