Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: PStonehou
New Today: 29
New Yesterday: 87
Overall: 139929

People Online:
Visitors: 49
Members: 2
Total: 51 .

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Incident request Logging
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Incident request Logging

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> The ITIL Service Desk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rhackett
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Sep 25, 2010
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 6:19 am    Post subject: Incident request Logging Reply with quote

Hi all,

Our servicedesk engineers suffer from "corridoor calls" i.e. people approaching them for help rather than ringing the servicedesk.

I am looking for benchmarks on what is the typical percentage of calls like this, I've not found any studies or stats.

Also do most service desks accept this user behaviour and log the call themselves or not actually log the call.

Thanks
Rob
Back to top
View user's profile
Diarmid
Senior Itiler


Joined: Mar 04, 2008
Posts: 1884
Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme

PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rob,

welcome.

Firstly there is no such thing as a "typical" figure or benchmark for such behaviour. Nor is there an average or a tolerance threshold.

The issue is management and control.


As far as casual requests are concerned, the only acceptable number to deal with is none whatsoever.

Control is not retrospective. You can empower your engineers to make decisions "on the spot", but you cannot permit them to make uninformed decisions and the limits of their scope and authority must be clearly defined.

How do your service desk engineers establish that the person waylaying them is authorized to make the request?

How do they establish priority for the request?

How do they inform "HQ" that they have been delayed?

How do they account for their time?

What do they do if they are not the best person for the particular task (but think they can muddle through okay)?

How do they access the history of the service component(s) they are asked to do something to?

Of course, they are stymied if a change is required anyway.

These kind of issues need addressing. Nevertheless there is also the issue of travel and saving journeys where remote sites are involved. So, still dealing with all the control issues, it might be prudent to enable an engineer to perform a number of actions on one visit, if (to repeat myself) you still achieve full management control of the activity by some means.
_________________
"Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> The ITIL Service Desk All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.