Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: LKorff
New Today: 11
New Yesterday: 69
Overall: 148088

People Online:
Visitors: 72
Members: 1
Total: 73 .

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Change Initiator
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Change Initiator

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mkandy
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Aug 20, 2008
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:22 pm    Post subject: Change Initiator Reply with quote

Hi all,

I'm getting stuck on an issue with engagement of Change Management. I work for an outsource company who also do a lot of hosting, with technical teams that support the environments.

Our customers are raising changes directly into our Change Management tool to the best of their ability, however they cannot detail the resource required to implement it, nor their availability, as such our Change Management team rejects the changes as not having enough information.

After speaking to the Change Managers, they have told me that they're not a technical resource, so cannot stipulate that a particular Change requires Unix/Wintel/DBA/whatever involvement, and that the onus is on the initiator to raise the change with all the details. However, as mentioned, we're an outsource company so the technical teams do not have that sort of relationship with the customer. The customer cannot pick up the phone and talk directly to our technical guys.

Anyway, the result is, they've put in a very complicated process that essentially goes through Request Management systems, sends tasks to a Project Management Office to scope out the requirements, provide a quote and timescales, which, if approved, result in the writing and eventual implementation of a Change Request....

I'm of the view that actually, our Change Service should be technically aware and be helping our customers raise Change Requests...am I asking to much?!

Please help!
Back to top
View user's profile
Diarmid
Senior Itiler


Joined: Mar 04, 2008
Posts: 1884
Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is obviously a massive hole in your change management process.

When a customer submits a change request, they quite reasonably do so in the terms in which they use the service. The first task of change management is to translate this into its technical requirements and implications. what would be the point of a company having outsourced to you if they still had to keep a detailed knowledge of the technical side of the service? They would need to keep all their technical staff!

I see one of two situations;

1. your change managers have not been trained for the job they are required to do and procedures have not been developed to meet the requirement.

or

2. you have failed to set up an intermediate facility to identify the technical etc.s of customer change requests before passing the request to your change managers.


If outsourcing companies are so rubbish that they do not understand this from the start why do people still use them? And why can I not get a job?
_________________
"Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
mkandy
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Aug 20, 2008
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's certainly something they used to do, however people take over a service and change things, not always for the betterment of the business as displayed here.

I'm essentially arguing that Change Management should absolutely be owning this piece of work, but want to make sure I'm not talking cobblers.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.