For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone
Note: ® ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.
The Itil Community Forum: Forums
ITIL :: View topic - Instruction manual versus workaround
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 6:29 pm Post subject: Instruction manual versus workaround
I'm curious about your opinion on the following.
I consider known errors and workarounds like the appendix to the instruction manual titled "what to do in case of issues?"
Customers may have different ideas then service providers about:
1. Something being an issue or not.
2. Something being part of the service or not.
Can you imagine of any situation where a perceived issue (by the customer) is considered and accepted as a problem, while it's actually part of the normal service ("works as designed") or not in scope of the service? I see some grey areas.
Joined: Dec 30, 2005 Posts: 21 Location: Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 8:24 pm Post subject:
Interesting post!!
The situations you are referring are not common scenarios but they are not very rare as well.
The situations can arise due to many reasons, few to list here are:
(1) Users are not aware or trained-enough on service features/capabilities/limitations
(2) Service features/limitation, not well defined/documented by service provider
(3) Service design assumptions, not verified with users/customers during requirement analysis etc.
To give example, I am using non-IT situation:
User calls up Desk registering that the air conditioner (AC) blower is not working evenly. It blows cold air in waves of high and low blowing. – Desk explains this being a ‘Sea-shore” effect setting, a new feature of the AC, asks user set it to ‘Normal’ if it is not desired. (Reason 1 above)
Operating temperatures (a range of temperatures within which the equipment is supposed to work normal) is one of the criteria any equipment manufacturer would provide. If equipment is used outside this range, it may breakdown or behave unexpectedly. If these limitations are not provided by service provider to user, the user may use the equipment outside operating temperatures, and call desk reporting an issue if it breakdowns. (Reason 2 above)
Incompatibility of an application designed and developed for specific Operating System (OS) does not work with previous version of OS. User calls desk to realize that the assumption that the application will be used only with the specific OS was not validated with user. (Reason 3 above)
Joined: Mar 04, 2008 Posts: 1883 Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 4:40 pm Post subject:
The customer does not have an interest in "works as designed", but rather in "works as required".
A design failing is no better than an implementation failing from the customer perspective. _________________ "Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum