For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone
Note: ® ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.
The Itil Community Forum: Forums
ITIL :: View topic - Change the term Standard change to something else
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:35 am Post subject: Change the term Standard change to something else
An environment I'm the change manager for is folding in new Change Management processes, ITIL and best practices in other areas such as incident.
Now, there is a discomfort with the term "Standard" change. There is a push to call this "Routine" instead. There is no push to change the associated definition, just the word.
Now, I'm against this. The reason is that the current environment has some miles on it and most terms used are currently not in alignment with ITIL/Best Practices.
Seems to me that even if the term "Standard" means different things to different people now, you have to put a stake in the ground. As a matter of fact some seminars regarding ITIL have been provided to let folks get used to ITIL, it's suggestions and terms.
So, am I being petty and concerned with nothing or am I on the right path? If this terminology swap goes forward, similar name changes will likely permeate new ITSM tool(s) that are currently being deployed (since we all know these tools are all editable/customizable).
Joined: Mar 04, 2008 Posts: 1883 Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:20 am Post subject:
I have never liked the term standard change, because a) it encourages a lack of definition for all of its instances; b) it tends to narrow the scope of things that can (and should) get such special treatment (especially by applying it mostly to simple things; c) it is defined in almost as many ways as there are organizations using the term.
The first two reasons apply to your organization's proposed renaming - in spades for the second reason.
The only part of the concept that has much value is the idea that some kinds of predictable changes can be treated differently in ways that are more efficient and often quicker than going through the default change process. Such changes need to have a documented procedure of their own which covers how to achieve the correct governance for them, what conditions must apply for any change to qualify for this treatment and how scheduling will be managed. _________________ "Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum