For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone
Note: ® ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.
Hello all,
We are currently implementing change managment to our system.
There is a question that we can't find the answer.
Is it possible to create a change from an incident?
If change management covers all the configuration item changes in this case I can open directly a change order. But in the reference the way described like this:
incident-->problem-->change order
I don't understand please help me
thank you
ermanu
The point in ITIL is that by the time you get to raise a Request For Change, you have already analyzed the root cause of your incident, which means you have performed the Problem Control subprocess and you are in the middle of the Error Control subprocess of Problem Management.
There are reasons why ITIL looks at it this way:
1) The goal of Incident Mgt is to restore service ASAP. We are concerned that you may be spending too much time trying to fix an IT problem, and not enough restoring the business service. In other words, we want to make sure, at Incident Mgt level, that you are doing your utmost for speed.
2) We are also concerned that if you go straight from Incident Mgt to an RFC, you may miss the opportunity to document a workaround that could considerably reduce the time to resolution for later incidents of the same type.
3) From the Incident Mgt process, you should be missing the 'big picture' that Problem Management has. Where you would expect Incident Mgt to give more priority to urgency, you would see Problem Management prioritize more on business impact. By going straight from Incident to RFC, you could be working on the wrong priority.
All that is fine and easy but it's theory. If you can make sure that the three above principles are maintained in your implementation, then you have implemented Problem Mgt even though it will not be recognized formally in the overall process.
I always take the side of the structured approach and wonder: why would the Service Desk operator want to raise an RFC? Will it speed up the process? What are the circumstances? What is the trade-off? Am I burning steps? ... and I think you are asking yourself those questions so that's great. Ultimately you need to do what makes sense for your organization. _________________ BR,
Fabien Papleux
Accenture
Technology Consulting | Service Excellence
Red Badge Certified
Joined: Sep 16, 2006 Posts: 3110 Location: London, UK
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:21 am Post subject:
in addition to Fabian's data
Consider Service Requests from your customers/users
Firewall changes - open / close ports, ACL list change
Software Installation, Upgrades, Patching etc
would not really have an Incident but may have a Service Request - Although a Service Request starts as an incident because that is the way ITIL defines an incident and Service request _________________ John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)
Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum