Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: daughertyclifford1
New Today: 15
New Yesterday: 169
Overall: 130748

People Online:
Visitors: 56
Members: 5
Total: 61 .

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Validating Metric Reports from Outsourcing Partner
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Validating Metric Reports from Outsourcing Partner

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> ITIL Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Lesley
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jan 02, 2007
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:50 am    Post subject: Validating Metric Reports from Outsourcing Partner Reply with quote

I am struggling with in-house validation of monthly SLA metrics reported by our outsourcing partner. Our vendor delivers a monthly report on SLA metrics outlined in the contract, but I can't seem to find an efficient method for confirming that what they are reporting is accurate.

How do you handle the SLA reconcilliation process? Do you rely on your outsourcing vendor to tell you if they are hitting their SLA's?

Thanks,
Lesley Osterman
Contract Coordinator
Back to top
View user's profile
m_croon
Senior Itiler


Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 262
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you have a provision in your contract with the outsourcing partner, where they are obliged to allow an anual audit of their work by an external partner (appointed by you)?

That's what I would do. And if the results are not satisfactory, you could have a third party do more regular checks.

Cheers,

Michiel
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
JennBurn
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jan 09, 2007
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 4:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Michiel,

Depending on the size of your company and the resources available to you, I sometimes ask the supplier to provide me with the Raw data so that we can do the calculations internally. However there are cases that we do not have the knowledge base to validate the information. Thus the reason one of the clauses that I have started implementing in all of my Supplier contracts is that when conducting our audits, (either our internal auditors or external auditors) we should find faults with results based on the monthly reports, we are able to apply the chargebacks for all the months previous from the date of the last audit.

In addition if you are not meeting your internal SLA's up time of applications etc... this may trigger a closer look at your suppliers performaces.

regards,
Back to top
View user's profile
JennBurn
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jan 09, 2007
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sorry my previous post should have been addressed to Lesely!

Regards,

Jenn
Service Level and Problem Management Manager
Back to top
View user's profile
Yorkie
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Dec 21, 2006
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lesley,

If the SLAs have teeth in that financial penalties are applied to miised targets, then both parties will need to aqree the method for reconciling the data. Independant sources of data via an audit are useful but is once a year enough?

Validation of actual data, whether reponse times or incident fix times is both time consuming and expensive. Time can be wasted arguing about pennies. The SLA needs to address these issues upfront and make the SLA a workable solution. Any costs involved in delivering the data need to be included upfriont also. The authors of the SLA and contract must involve the Service Management people who will run with the SLA in production.

If service spans several suppliers, i.e Data centre, network and frontend suppliers its even worse, you need an end to end SLA.

Good Luck
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> ITIL Discussion All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.