Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: pierrewardini
New Today: 1
New Yesterday: 42
Overall: 148409

People Online:
Visitors: 42
Members: 2
Total: 44 .

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Recording the "Root Cause" for Known Errors of new
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Recording the "Root Cause" for Known Errors of new

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Problem Management
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Use the same RC categorisation?
No
66%
 66%  [ 2 ]
Yes
33%
 33%  [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 3

Author Message
pdw1975
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:08 pm    Post subject: Recording the "Root Cause" for Known Errors of new Reply with quote

Hello all,

New subscriber and keen Service Management chap here I would be interested to hear opinion on something please Smile

An organisation I am working with is starting to push on getting Known Error (KE) info from new and upgraded services. These are highlighted through a formal Service Introduction process.

The KEs are getting logged in the Problem Management tool and assigned appropriately, to be investigated for fixing. That aspect is fine, but there is very recently a call to add the same Root Cause categorisation as is recorded for reactive Problems.

I'm uncomfortable with this as it really feels like it is different information. Capturing the RC info for reactive Problems tells us where we have deficiencies to address - Do you think you can actually have a 'root cause' for a KE that has come from Service Introduction? If so there is surely a requirement to highlight it as non-reactive? It just doesn't feel right!

Any thoughts gratefully received.

Many thanks,
Piers.
Back to top
View user's profile
eisbergsk
Senior Itiler


Joined: Nov 01, 2004
Posts: 81
Location: Sask, Canada

PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

interesting concept. I'm stuck in Reactive mode, and I appreciate the importance of tracking reality (actual recorded incidents, not just speculation). But "Known Error info from new and upgraded services" could be considered....proactive PM. Can your tool handle adding that as a category? Or perhaps, even the fact that a problem record has no incidents recorded against it would make it a proactive problem.
It depends on what your RC categories are and what you use them for. I like to focus on what I call "Actionable Root cause". Sometimes the Root Cause is known, but there is no specific action that can be taken to remove it. Instead of stone-walling, I ask the Subject Matter Experts to find an infrastructure item that can be changed, instead of focussing on the one that can't. So our Root Cause categories are the same as our CMDB categories... does that help or confuse?
/Sharon
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Problem Management All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.