Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Note: ® ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.
Search
Languages
Select Interface Language:
Advertising
Please contact us via the feedback page to discuss advertising rates.
Joined: Jan 12, 2007 Posts: 48 Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 5:52 pm Post subject: RFC vs. Change Record
The blue book suggests the separate relationships between CIs and RFCs and CIs and Change Records. Does anyone uses separate change records that are neither part of RFCs nor Release documentation? _________________ Krzysztof (Chris) Baczkiewicz
IT Standards Support
Eracent
Joined: Jan 03, 2007 Posts: 189 Location: Redmond, WA
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 6:32 am Post subject:
This was always a rather funny subject when brought up in class.
In the modern world, the RFC is itself a a type of Change Record. But remember that ITIL was invented prior to sophisticated tools. In that time, an RFC could have been a piece of paper, or an electronic form, or an email. Any of which would be completely outside of the Change Management software package. In fact, the Filtering activity of the Change Management process may have stopped a RFC from ever becoming a Change Record.
In modern Change Management applications, anyone who logs into the app and submits a RFC has, in fact, created an un-approved Change Record.
That was at least our understanding of the separation between RFCs and Change Records.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
