Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
· Home
· Content
· Feedback
· News
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account


The five ITIL books can be obtained directly from the publisher's website:

Or as downloadable PDFs: HERE

Current Membership

Latest: agotiw
New Today: 26
New Yesterday: 31
Overall: 231530

People Online:
Visitors: 106
Members: 1
Total: 107 .



Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Resources

Service related resources
Service Level Agreement

How to set up
IT Change Management
Process Info-Graphic

NOTE: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


Select Interface Language:

Please contact us via the feedback page to discuss advertising rates.

The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Third Party Scheduled Maintenance?
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Third Party Scheduled Maintenance?

Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:10 pm    Post subject: Third Party Scheduled Maintenance? Reply with quote

We deal with a number of third parties - they're pretty good at telling us a few days in advance of any scheduled outages, but we have no say in whether or not they actually *have* the outage.

Should this be raised as a standard change? I see no value in putting it through an approval process (since it's going to happen anyway), but it could be useful to have on an FSC, so the Service Desk can field calls about it.
Back to top
View user's profile
Senior Itiler

Joined: Feb 28, 2006
Posts: 411
Location: Coventry, England

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Timb

I have a similar situation, The way we cover this, as we cannot control it, is to use 'notifications' which we then post in our FSoC.

We get these suppliers to send us a 'Notification' which contains most of the info I want for an RFC

Some of our suppliers are more than happy to let us know what they are doing, but are less happy to have us control it.
Others are more amenable. We have started to add into our contracts with our suppliers that they will use our CM system, or be deemed in breach of contract.

This has actually led to some suppliers introducing CM into their companies, what a result!!!!


Back to top
View user's profile
Senior Itiler

Joined: May 07, 2005
Posts: 121
Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We also put a 'For Info' item in the FSC.

The support team with the realtionship to the 3rd party owns the Change, so they raise it and close it down afterwards.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail

Joined: Feb 09, 2007
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 2:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When you say third you mean somebody who you pay for the service in question?

If so, i would suggest that you take the advise above and enter into your contract with them that YOU have the final say not them. We have total control over our third parties, when they inform us of scheduled maintenance, it is subject to our change process and if rejected, will not go ahead.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003

Forums ©


Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.