Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
· Home
· Content
· Feedback
· News
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account


The five ITIL books can be obtained directly from the publisher's website:

Or as downloadable PDFs: HERE

Current Membership

Latest: Shanna38
New Today: 3
New Yesterday: 26
Overall: 231714

People Online:
Visitors: 121
Members: 0
Total: 121



Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Resources

Service related resources
Service Level Agreement

How to set up
IT Change Management
Process Info-Graphic

NOTE: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


Select Interface Language:

Please contact us via the feedback page to discuss advertising rates.

The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Interesting insights on service desk
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Interesting insights on service desk

Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> The ITIL Service Desk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Joined: Mar 08, 2005
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:19 am    Post subject: Interesting insights on service desk Reply with quote

Interesting insights on service desk,

1) Is SLA maintained as a CI in CMDB?

2) If SLA is maintained in CMDB, is a hard copy of SLA required with Service Desk

3) L2 and 3rd party support are this standard terminologies as per ITIL

4) Which department second line support come from (is it from problem management)

5) If Incident closure is provided by service desk are we merging service desk and incident management
Back to top
View user's profile
Senior Itiler

Joined: Mar 12, 2005
Posts: 255
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply to 5: Merging Incident Management and Service Desk Reply with quote

The service desk is not a process byt a function: Mainly to provide a single point of contact between the business and IT. I like to think of the Service Desk as the Public Face of IT to the business - which means it is the Public Face of everything IT does, and not just Incident Management. There isn't a process 'conflict' the way there would be betwee Incident and Problem management.

The Service Desk is where Incidents are raised and recorded. (It would be difficult to imagine how single point of contact would be achieved if there was somewhere else end-users and customers could go to report incidents.)

At some point in the incident life-cylce responsibility for resoultion activity may be handed to parties not on the service desk. They may need to seek addintional info from the source of the incident - who ever raised in from the business.

It depends on the nature of the organistation and the skills of the people working the incident - but in some cases you may want strong re-inforcement of the single point of contact objective and require all communication be through the Service Desk staff. Or, as is more likely, you will allow support staff to interact with end-users and customers where they need to - as this will entail less double-handling, and attenuate the chinese-whispers effect of information being passed form person to person.

The case for incident closure at the Service Desk is stronger. Closure should always be negotiated with the client who raised the incident. Service desk staff are trained to think in terms of services and business capability, and are better palced to help a client apply a work around (remember the underlying problem is not always fixed at resolution). Without adequate training in the business, technical staff may not be well placed to negotiate closure.

Giving the Service Desk responsibility for closure is simply acknowledging the role they can play within Incident Management - it is not a confusion of two distinct processes.

You should always consider what the Service Desk can contribute to all the processes - after all they are closest to the business, and have day-to-day, on-the-graound knowledge that can easily be missed at othe levels of process management.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> The ITIL Service Desk All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003

Forums ©


Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.