Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: RMatthias
New Today: 47
New Yesterday: 44
Overall: 146557

People Online:
Visitors: 33
Members: 1
Total: 34 .

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Third Party Scheduled Maintenance?
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Third Party Scheduled Maintenance?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TimB
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:10 pm    Post subject: Third Party Scheduled Maintenance? Reply with quote

We deal with a number of third parties - they're pretty good at telling us a few days in advance of any scheduled outages, but we have no say in whether or not they actually *have* the outage.

Should this be raised as a standard change? I see no value in putting it through an approval process (since it's going to happen anyway), but it could be useful to have on an FSC, so the Service Desk can field calls about it.
Back to top
View user's profile
Ed
Senior Itiler


Joined: Feb 28, 2006
Posts: 411
Location: Coventry, England

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Timb

I have a similar situation, The way we cover this, as we cannot control it, is to use 'notifications' which we then post in our FSoC.

We get these suppliers to send us a 'Notification' which contains most of the info I want for an RFC

Some of our suppliers are more than happy to let us know what they are doing, but are less happy to have us control it.
Others are more amenable. We have started to add into our contracts with our suppliers that they will use our CM system, or be deemed in breach of contract.

This has actually led to some suppliers introducing CM into their companies, what a result!!!!

Regards

Ed
Back to top
View user's profile
Skinnera
Senior Itiler


Joined: May 07, 2005
Posts: 121
Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We also put a 'For Info' item in the FSC.

The support team with the realtionship to the 3rd party owns the Change, so they raise it and close it down afterwards.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Benson112
Itiler


Joined: Feb 09, 2007
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 2:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When you say third party....do you mean somebody who you pay for the service in question?

If so, i would suggest that you take the advise above and enter into your contract with them that YOU have the final say not them. We have total control over our third parties, when they inform us of scheduled maintenance, it is subject to our change process and if rejected, will not go ahead.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.