Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: RSnodgras
New Today: 36
New Yesterday: 55
Overall: 148158

People Online:
Visitors: 61
Members: 0
Total: 61

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - An industry standard for threshold?
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

An industry standard for threshold?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> The ITIL Service Desk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tmack
Itiler


Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:47 am    Post subject: An industry standard for threshold? Reply with quote

What I am looking for is any insight into what is an industry standard (if one exists) to outsourced Service Desk / Help Desk. Here is an example of what I am looking for advice on:

Example Situation:
Client buys 200,000/yr, lets say that breaks down to 547/day.
Provider has an obligation to be equipped to answer those 547/day + reasonable threshold (for both client & provider) as we all know those calls wont come in evenly each day.

Right now I sit somewhere in the threshold being built off of an increase by percentage of that daily 547 expectation in the 5%-30% range, so 547*10% = 602 calls a day would be what the provider needs to equipped to fulfill outside of that an exemption for that day is given to the engagement and is subsequently removed from counting against the provider.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
UKVIKING
Senior Itiler


Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: 3318
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tmack,

There is no standards per se

There may be statitistic - gartner etc about the # of trouble calls

Personally, I dont like SD contract/stipulations based on a fixed number of incidents. I think it is useless and a waste

Now KPIs such as % etc
_________________
John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)

Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter
Back to top
View user's profile
UrgentJensen
Senior Itiler


Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Posts: 458
Location: London

PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi tmack,

Agreed, all thresholds are relative and therefore absolute volume figures miss the point.

It's up to you and your organisation to decide what gives you enough flexibility, but as a customer I'd have thought your contract would be best focusing on giving you flexibility. Basing the service on % KPIs (as Viking said) will take into account that some calls take longer than others and/or more resources. If you buy 547 calls a day but they're mostly password resets, then you're probably paying massively over the odds, and that's a far greater insight into value for money.

If that's what you're getting at...?

UJ
_________________
Did I just say that out loud?

(Beige badge)
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> The ITIL Service Desk All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.