Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: RMorshead
New Today: 13
New Yesterday: 86
Overall: 139912

People Online:
Visitors: 49
Members: 1
Total: 50 .

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Testing and Verification of ITIL Implementation
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Testing and Verification of ITIL Implementation

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> ITIL Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bobwill
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:33 am    Post subject: Testing and Verification of ITIL Implementation Reply with quote

After a partial or full implementation if ITIL, how does one test it, or verify (especially to upper management) that things are working and working well? I.e., I can implement an operations architecture and I am able to test it too; how about ITIL?
Back to top
Azard
Senior Itiler


Joined: Apr 26, 2005
Posts: 56

PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2005 10:20 pm    Post subject: Measuring ITIL Reply with quote

hi, you will need to define the metrics of how well the process is working?
Ex. if you incident managemenet process is working well, you should be able to measure increase in satisfaction from your clients. This could be a metric you choose to report on.
If you are tracking software licenses as CI's, when you do a reconciliation, your metric should indicate is the company saving money by reusing licenses, or do you have more licenses than needed?

hope that gives a few ideas.

cheers,
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
RandyASteinberg
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2005 1:49 pm    Post subject: Testing Your ITIL Implementation Reply with quote

The proof is in the metrics. Each process should have established critical success factors and Key Performance indicators. These should be measured and reported on each month. The ability to reach targets as described by these will indicate whether you are succeeding or not.
Back to top
rjp
Senior Itiler


Joined: Mar 12, 2005
Posts: 255
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2005 6:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Remember the M in ITSM - ITIL processes are management processes, not operational processes. The justification for ITIL is that traditionaly IT producction has been poorly managed.

ITIL processes are designed to increase the clarity, visibility, and measurability (is that even a word) of ICT production. So the inforamtion gathered in your Incendent Management processes are not designed - first and foremost - to tell you how well your incident mangement is going, but how well your infrastructure is travelling.

So for example MTTR (Mean Time to Resolution) isn't automatically a measure of the IM process performance - perhaps the prudction people and change management has really got there act together this month and the only change effected incidents were of a trivial nature and easy to resolve at first point of contact.

So take care not to apply the producction metrics your ITSM processes enable to a performance indicator of the processes themselves.

Checking the health of the process has two aspects - neither of which is really to do that much with throughput (or 'quantitive performance')

1: Process quality - eg: analysing how many incidents were re-classified after being assigned.

2: Overall maturity - aimed at assessing how well your SM processes are controlling and improving the production. So that you can relate incidents through problem management to a prior change, indicates a maturity level higher than processes where that link is still invisible. That is a very real indicator that your ITIL implementation is working - and has nothing to do with how many incidents are being caused by changes, or how qhichly each on was resolved.

The Service Desk - being a function not a process is slightly different, and it does make sense to have metrics that measure how well the Service Desk is performing - though the ceiling on that performance will related directly to the level of maturity of your processes.

NB: Assessing process quality and maturity, and the leel to which customer expectations are being met are very good habits to be in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> ITIL Discussion All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.