| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
thmunson15 Newbie


Joined: Aug 20, 2008 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:44 am Post subject: Quarterbacking incidents |
|
|
| I was a given responsibility for developing quarterbacking procedures for high severity incidents. Is there any information available related to this topic? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UKVIKING Senior Itiler

Joined: Sep 16, 2006 Posts: 3118 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was going to post an obscure american football reference
What you are looking for is the major incident process
the blue book (Support v2) should have some ideas
Basically, you have a person manage the incident from start to finish after the initial identification as a major incident
The incident process for major incidents should be like the incident process for all other incidents
the only diff is the possible/prob involvement of Pro Man and Cha Man _________________ John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)
Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UrgentJensen Senior Itiler

Joined: Feb 23, 2005 Posts: 458 Location: London
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
quarterbacking?? _________________ Did I just say that out loud?
(Beige badge) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diarmid Senior Itiler

Joined: Mar 04, 2008 Posts: 1883 Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| UrgentJensen wrote: | | quarterbacking?? |
I'm sure it is just an obscure metaphor. _________________ "Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
erfo02 Itiler

Joined: Mar 11, 2008 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I do agree that the process is the same but I would definitely add one thing into what you call "quarterback procedures" and ITIL calls major incident as already mentioned.
What I would suggest is to create a matrix saying what kind of information should be sent, to whom and when. This should be prepared for all priorities but the major benefit will be for the higher priorities. In some cases it will be pure information and in some cases it will be a hierarchical escalation meaning that the recipient are expected to take action.
I usually do a matrix with 5 different levels of priority: Emergency, critical, high, normal and low. By using 5 levels you can create a splendid combination of Urgency and Impact ( 3 x 3) where the result will be:
1 2 3
2 3 4
3 4 5
I hope this will help you move further. It is all about documentation and training. _________________ Eric Fogelstrom
Founder/CEO CompITIL
ITIL Service Manager |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ozz Itiler

Joined: Apr 02, 2006 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Diarmid wrote: | | UrgentJensen wrote: | | quarterbacking?? |
I'm sure it is just an obscure metaphor. |
Yeah thats the dude in American football that chucks the ball when all the big dudes are trying to crush him. He calls the plays so the the other dudes know where he is throwing the ball and the dude catching (hopefully) will be in the same place as the ball further down the field..
Oz _________________ Ozzie Sutcliffe
NYC |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|