Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: KGoodisso
New Today: 17
New Yesterday: 49
Overall: 146046

People Online:
Visitors: 66
Members: 0
Total: 66

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Use of the term 'SLO'
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Use of the term 'SLO'

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> ITIL Service Delivery
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tilon
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jan 21, 2009
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:40 am    Post subject: Use of the term 'SLO' Reply with quote

In my (relatively large) company, we seem to use the term 'service level agreement' to mean an agreement with a customer where there are penalties/credits attached for missing targets and 'service level objective' for an agreement where there are no penalties. I understand this isn't how ITIL would define the terms (in fact, I don't even see SLO as an official term in the glossary -- I see service level requirement and service level target.)

I try my best to steer things towards the ITIL definitions, but I'm wondering if this practice is widespread or if it's one of those peculiar bits of jargon in my company.
Back to top
View user's profile
UKVIKING
Senior Itiler


Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: 3313
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SLO ? ppffttt

Sounding like they are mish mashing the process of developing an SLA with the SLA itself

And of course

having an SLA called SLO has all sorts of meaning
_________________
John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)

Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter
Back to top
View user's profile
UrgentJensen
Senior Itiler


Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Posts: 458
Location: London

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Tilon,

Nope, never worked to an 'SLO'. Too vague anyway.

UJ
_________________
Did I just say that out loud?

(Beige badge)
Back to top
View user's profile
Diarmid
Senior Itiler


Joined: Mar 04, 2008
Posts: 1884
Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme

PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A service Level Objective ought to be a target to be achieved within (e.g. by x%) a Service Level Agreement. And it needs to be understood that it is an internal measure used to identify thresholds for responsive action.

As a statement of service to customers, it cannot work without agreement over budgets and charges and what will arise if it is not attained.

In the real world there are repercussions if services are not delivered to a satisfactory level. It is easier if the arrangements are formalized in an agreement. And it is better to call an agreement an agreement rather than an objective, because then there is a chance that people will know what they are talking about.
_________________
"Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
asrilrm
Senior Itiler


Joined: Oct 07, 2007
Posts: 441
Location: Jakarta, INA

PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

Service Level Agreement and Service Level Objective to me are quite "high level" words, and qualitative.
SL Agreement is all service levels that are agreed between two parties (customer and provider) whether they have consequences or not.
SL Objective is for what purpose the service levels were built.
Both words don't give quantitative measurements to assess the worthiness of the Service Level itself.

That's my opinion though.

Asril
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> ITIL Service Delivery All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.