Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
· Home
· Content
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: DorrisOc
New Today: 75
New Yesterday: 143
Overall: 204325

People Online:
Visitors: 160
Members: 2
Total: 162 .

Select Interface Language:

Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.

The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - CMDB implementation
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CMDB implementation

Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Configuration Management
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 10:43 am    Post subject: CMDB implementation Reply with quote

I am designing a CMDB and am wrestling with the concept of a SOR. My organization uses various tools for service desk and asset management. My question is this. Should I designatee a tool like Remedy as a SOR or must I go to the original sourse of the Remedy information?
Back to top

PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's a SOR?

Nothing wrong with having multiple authorized sources for information and then pointing to them via links in your CMDB.

My preference is to use the original data source for authorized information, howwever if Remedy (in your case) is very tightly coupled with your sources, I see no issue with using it as an authorized source. The trick is to establish what you want to use as an authorized source and then lock it down with solid change control to make sure things don't get corrupted.

If your intention is to have one large massive repository for everything, this may be problematic as an approach. The maintenance and audit effort around this could be very onerous.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Configuration Management All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003

Forums ©


Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.