Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: PStarnes
New Today: 18
New Yesterday: 51
Overall: 146484

People Online:
Visitors: 57
Members: 3
Total: 60 .

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ® ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - ITIL Process harmonization - how to include vendors
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

ITIL Process harmonization - how to include vendors

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> ITIL Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
AndyW
Senior Itiler


Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 7:27 pm    Post subject: ITIL Process harmonization - how to include vendors Reply with quote

Hi experts,

I have a question for you. We have the INC and CHG processes implemented. Unfortunately both processes do use different tools (fragmented tool suite). Now we have a vendor who works for our company. The vendor has a pretty sophisticated ITIL framework suite on his side (processes integrated within one tool).

What is the best practice in terms of our own processes? Do I need to build interfaces from our INC and CHG processes to the vendor tool or is it better to track all related tickets and changes on the vendor side i.e. vendor creates INC ticket -> RFC will be raised on vendor side etc. ...

Big disadvantage would be that the reports we get from the vendor do not follow our company reporting standards.

I'm interessted in your ideas ...

Cheers,
Back to top
View user's profile
Diarmid
Senior Itiler


Joined: Mar 04, 2008
Posts: 1884
Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme

PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 7:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Andy,

you are starting at the wrong end. Your first question must be to define processes, responsibilities and authority in relation to the vendor. Especially the management processes. It is not practical to use the vendor's toolset unless you can manage what you are doing on it. That will include report production.

Unless you are going to ask the vendor to do your service management for you, you will not be relying on their reporting, you will not have them managing incidents and you will certainly not have them managing your RFCs.

Once you have mapped out the proper relationship with the vendor you can then examine how to implement it with your, and the vendor's present tools or by some other means.
_________________
"Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
TomOzITIL_2
Senior Itiler


Joined: May 14, 2009
Posts: 128

PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When you're dealing with any "ITIL" tooling vendor, beware, beware, beware. Frankly, some individuals from the ITIL tool vendors could do with some business ethics.

If they say: you can "buy ITIL compliance out of the box" - run away and don't look back.
If they suggest: that you should accept their processes as good practice without proper business requirements analysis of YOUR business - run away and don't look back.
If they say: that tools can overcome culture they're blatantly lying or are completely clueless.
If they say: that a 100% completed and integrated CMDB is mandatory for you to deliver business benefits, ask them to write up the business case (and watch them squirm).

Lastly, when it is time for training, don't just blindly sheep dip everyone on ITIL v3 Foundation and teach them how to use the buttons on the tool.
A better training agenda (thanks to itskeptic) is:
1. Why are we doing this?
2. What changes for us?
3. Which of our in-house roles are impacted?
4. Which of our customers’ roles are impacted?
5. What do our new procedures look like?
6. What will you as an individual need to do differently?
7. Where can you find the detail of your new procedures?
8. How do the new tools work?
9. What help, support and coaching is available?
10. How do you feed back?
11. How will we measure and reward this new way of working?
12. Are you ready to start operating with these new tools and processes?
13. Most of all: what's in this for you?

If you've done the preparation to fully answer these questions then you're on the right track.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> ITIL Discussion All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops © 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest © 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.