Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: LIta
New Today: 28
New Yesterday: 42
Overall: 148214

People Online:
Visitors: 59
Members: 1
Total: 60 .

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Support teams contacting users
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Support teams contacting users

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> The ITIL Service Desk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ormondo
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:17 pm    Post subject: Support teams contacting users Reply with quote

Hi,

I'm currently in charge of rolling out a new Incident Management process within my company. The problem being is that I want the Second and third line support teams to once contact the customers when they first respond to thier incidents and once when they are resolved.

I'm getting negative feedback saying that this goes against ITIL. However I still want the Service Desk to update users throughout the lifecycle of the incident.
Back to top
rjp
Senior Itiler


Joined: Mar 12, 2005
Posts: 255
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 12:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

2 key objectives for the ITIL Service Desk are to gaurantee access to the IT organisation by the end-user / customer, and to provide a single point of contact for that access.

Note that the Incident Management process 'inherits' these objectives by virtue of the fact that the Service Desk is the start point for Incident resolution.

In fact some KPIs for Service Desk and Incident Management overlap - for example an increase in the % of Incidents resolved during initial contact with the Desk.

Of course the Service Desk can't cover everything in the Incident Managment process - incidents will need to be transfered to Level 2 and greater support staff. Also System Incidents - those raised internally, frequently automatically, may be dealt with directly by technical staff resonsible for the system in error, and Service Desk staff only informed of the Incident's existence and progress. It is their role in these cases, however, to assess business impact, and make necessary notifications to the community, or contact specifically affected areas or individuals.

Obviously, there will be times when Level 2 staff, in the course of their investigations may need to talk directly to customers or users. And I don't think this is 'un-ITIL' - whatever that would be.

The key point is to ensure that you are not splitting responsibilities arbitrarily and allowing multiple paths for the same process - and inadvertantly setting up a situation where things don't get done (or done well) because there is confusion about who is suppposed to do it and when.

Incident Reports will progress through predefined 'states' usually indicated by a dedicated status field - with values along the lines of 'Open', ' Assigned', 'In Progress', 'Pending', 'Resolved', 'Closed'. (It often depends on the tool - some have 'states' like 'Waiting' and 'Abandoned').

It tis the Service Desk's responsibility for monitoring these states and coordinating with the user where the Incident they reported is.

It is probably not a good idea to hand this basic customer liaison activity over to other staff. Having to report status back through the Desk keeps everyone working together, keeps the Desk informed (absolutely critical) and certainly increases customer satisfaction.

Level 2 staff should be able to talk to the user / customer to seek further information, to confirm a site visit where necessary, or other interactions specifically needed for them to play their part.

But account for the customer satisfaction 'risks' in going outside this role-specific communication - for example:

* The risk the customer will be asked to repeat the 'story' to Level 2 staff who don't carefully read the report.

* The risk that your more technically focused staff won't have the people skills to handle end users well.

* The risk that important facts will not be recorded and so shared between the different parties involved.

* The risk that end users having once dealt directly with technical staff will be more likely to try and circumvent the desk to talk to that 'nice young man who was so helpful last time'

And so on.

So, yes Level 2 will need to interact with end users during Incident Management - but stay focused on the objectives of both the Service Desk as a function of your business and Incident Management as a process - and don't compromise the achievement of those objectives.

I think 'locking' Level 2 to end-user communication into your incident life cycle is risking just that. You need to be clear that there are reasons why this is going to achieve better (not equal) levels of customer satisfaction that the 'standard' approaches.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> The ITIL Service Desk All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.