Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
· Home
· Content
· Feedback
· News
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account


The five ITIL books can be obtained directly from the publisher's website:

Or as downloadable PDFs: HERE

Current Membership

Latest: CathernWin
New Today: 56
New Yesterday: 64
Overall: 230443

People Online:
Visitors: 115
Members: 3
Total: 118 .



Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Resources

Service related resources
Service Level Agreement

How to set up
IT Change Management
Process Info-Graphic

NOTE: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


Select Interface Language:

Please contact us via the feedback page to discuss advertising rates.

The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - SLA for Problem Resolution
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SLA for Problem Resolution

Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Problem Management
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Joined: Dec 30, 2005
Posts: 21
Location: Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 7:59 pm    Post subject: SLA for Problem Resolution Reply with quote

Complexity of problems (and hence the TTR and TTKE ) varies from case to case and cannot be generalized for all problems with a given propriety.

Is it feasible to agree and adhere to time based SLA targets for resolving problems in real world?

If there are no agreed or committed timelines for resolution, how assigning priority will help Problem managers and analysts in undertaking problems for root cause and resolutions?

Back to top
View user's profile
Senior Itiler

Joined: Mar 04, 2008
Posts: 1894
Location: Helensburgh

PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Problems, unlike incidents, apply to the service provider, not to the customer. Therefore offering an SLA is inappropriate. This is not to say that you do not involve the customer in problems. Many problems will continue to impact or threaten services until resolved and you have to retain the confidence of your customer by letting them know what you are doing about it, involving them in the strategy as well as the investigation and testing and, crucially, involving them in how best to cope until the resolution is in place - workarounds. It is also the case that there may not be a cost effective resolution to a particular problem (at least in the foreseeable future), beyond some workaround.

By definition, problem investigation begins with unknowns. It is not possible to predict how long the investigation will take and it is not possible to predict how long it will take to design and implement the solution. Certainly, experience will allow a degree of judgement even at an early stage, but this can be no more than a probability. There will be occasions where this prediction turns out to be awry, because the problem has hidden depths or surprising twists.

You do not prioritize on how long it will take or according to timescale commitments. Priority is established by looking at the impact, risks and threats that a problem poses to the customer and and to the service provider. For example a 99% effective workaround would reduce the urgency of full resolution from the customer perspective, but if it involved large cost to the service provider, then it would retain commensurate priority.

While the management aspects of problem resolution can be readily defined and audited, there is some dependence on the knowledge, skills, experience and insight of the investigators and this is more difficult to evaluate in non-subjective ways. Every problem has the potential to have causes on the edge of or outside the skill-sets of the initial investigators.
"Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail

Joined: Dec 30, 2005
Posts: 21
Location: Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 2:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Diarmid,

Your reply helped us in closing one long-open discussion with our client's Problem Management team.

Thanks again,
Back to top
View user's profile
Senior Itiler

Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: 3595
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 5:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I ahve a couple of comments for this thread

Can Diarmid bill you for the answer ?

Does your client know that despite the money that they are paying your company, you have to seek descisions from an internet discussion forum because you dont have any one on board who has the skill set / experience / credentials to help the customer

I feel sorry for your client as it appears they have paid for something that cant be delivered

I also am scared that there are companies out there that have no clue about implementing ITSM using ITIL yet ae still touting themselves as an ITSM consultant firm

wow.. i am just flabbergasted at the last thought
John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)

Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Problem Management All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003

Forums ©


Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.