Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: ZIzp
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 65
Overall: 146094

People Online:
Visitors: 50
Members: 2
Total: 52 .

Languages
Select Interface Language:


Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Change the term Standard change to something else
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Change the term Standard change to something else

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
29erCM
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Nov 27, 2012
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:35 am    Post subject: Change the term Standard change to something else Reply with quote

An environment I'm the change manager for is folding in new Change Management processes, ITIL and best practices in other areas such as incident.

Now, there is a discomfort with the term "Standard" change. There is a push to call this "Routine" instead. There is no push to change the associated definition, just the word.

Now, I'm against this. The reason is that the current environment has some miles on it and most terms used are currently not in alignment with ITIL/Best Practices.

Seems to me that even if the term "Standard" means different things to different people now, you have to put a stake in the ground. As a matter of fact some seminars regarding ITIL have been provided to let folks get used to ITIL, it's suggestions and terms.

So, am I being petty and concerned with nothing or am I on the right path? If this terminology swap goes forward, similar name changes will likely permeate new ITSM tool(s) that are currently being deployed (since we all know these tools are all editable/customizable).

29er
Back to top
View user's profile
UKVIKING
Senior Itiler


Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: 3313
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh the horror.. oh the inhumanity

Thank the gods that you prevented this from happening..

Imagine the scene when the ITIL Police comes in like the SPanish Inquistion and hangs the miscreants by their mouse cable,

.......

Wait.. there is no ITIL Police...

23erCM,

Take the following sentence to heart

ITIL IS NOT A STANDARD. IT IS A SET OF BETTER PRACTICES. THE TERMINOLOGY IS A RECOMMENDATION.

You can call Standard CHanges - Bananas. No one cares but your own organization
_________________
John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)

Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter
Back to top
View user's profile
Diarmid
Senior Itiler


Joined: Mar 04, 2008
Posts: 1884
Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have never liked the term standard change, because a) it encourages a lack of definition for all of its instances; b) it tends to narrow the scope of things that can (and should) get such special treatment (especially by applying it mostly to simple things; c) it is defined in almost as many ways as there are organizations using the term.

The first two reasons apply to your organization's proposed renaming - in spades for the second reason.

The only part of the concept that has much value is the idea that some kinds of predictable changes can be treated differently in ways that are more efficient and often quicker than going through the default change process. Such changes need to have a documented procedure of their own which covers how to achieve the correct governance for them, what conditions must apply for any change to qualify for this treatment and how scheduling will be managed.
_________________
"Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.