For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone
Note: ® ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.
Joined: Mar 04, 2008 Posts: 1883 Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:15 am Post subject:
First answer: what do your procedures and policies say?
Second answer: do you want to have a controlled environment for your testing?
Third answer: could failure in test server affect customer service? For example by delaying a "live" change.
Fourth answer: could the test and live servers being out of step lead to a problem in the live server with something that was tested on a differently patched test server?
Fifth answer: if you are using the test server to test the patch does other test work need to be suspended pending completion or regression? _________________ "Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
What do your procedures and policies say?
Till now nothing has mentioned in procudure for the changes to test environment. Thats why only the question has come in picture now.
Second answer: do you want to have a controlled environment for your testing?
This is always and everywhere desirable.
Third answer: could failure in test server affect customer service? For example by delaying a "live" change.
depends on the consitionj, some times it can affect some time it wont.
Fourth answer: could the test and live servers being out of step lead to a problem in the live server with something that was tested on a differently patched test server?
We can not deny the possibility of such case.
the answer of All the questions you have puted on will be according to type of work/change we are doing with test enviroment. Some times , It may impact production by some way and some time not linkage with Live envirement.
In such scenerio, should we bring every change in test enviroment to the change management process????
Joined: Mar 04, 2008 Posts: 1883 Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:31 pm Post subject:
I would suggest in that case you need to fully control all such changes. _________________ "Method goes far to prevent trouble in business: for it makes the task easy, hinders confusion, saves abundance of time, and instructs those that have business depending, both what to do and what to hope."
William Penn 1644-1718
Joined: Sep 16, 2006 Posts: 3110 Location: London, UK
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:00 am Post subject:
I concur with Diarmid that you need to control the deployment of patches to test environment
Test environments are suppose to mirror the Production environment so that any change to production is first tested in the Test environment,.
I have 3 levels of test environment - System, Integration and Acceptance.
All are controlled by the Release Manager as far as Patches are concerned.
All patches must start in the development environment and progress through the test environments to Production
The RM tracks the deployments into the test environment and manages / approves the deployments. _________________ John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)
Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum