Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
· Home
· Content
· Feedback
· Forums
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

Current Membership

Latest: SheilaBonn
New Today: 22
New Yesterday: 32
Overall: 190952

People Online:
Visitors: 68
Members: 0
Total: 68

Select Interface Language:

Major ITIL Portals
For general information and resources, ITIL and ITSM World is the most well known for both ITIL and ITIL Books. A shorter snapshot approach can be found at ITIL Zone

Related Resources
Service related resources
Service Level Agreement

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.

The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Change Management Categorization
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Change Management Categorization

Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Joined: Jun 07, 2016
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 6:42 am    Post subject: Change Management Categorization Reply with quote

We are currently in the process of defining our Change Management process and are trying to determine how we should categorize changes. The idea behind this is to find the lead/turnaround time for a change.

We originally separated the change types by levels but are having some issues separating it from Impact.
1. Emergency
2. Level 1
3. Level 2
4. Level 3

How should changes be categorized? Should it be linked to Impact or Priority?

Any ideas are appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile
Senior Itiler

Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: 3498
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the usual terminology for changes are

Emergency, Normal, standard, minor, major, Fast Track, Retrospective

Emergency & Retrospective usually are the same. The difference is the retro change is written after the work is done. Emergency means there was time to think about and plan .. so to speak

Major and Minor indicate complexity

Fast Track, Normal, Standard usually associate time frames
John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)

Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter
Back to top
View user's profile

Joined: Sep 06, 2016
Posts: 12
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 5:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my company we have two levels

Change Types - ITIL types
* Normal
* Standard
* Emergency

Then similar to UKVIKING's comments for more classifications but we label them with IMPACT
* Low (no outage or low impact)
* Medium (small outage or moderate impact)
* High (long outage or high risk change due to various circumstances)
* Critical (unusually large outage or business mission critical functionality being impaired or touched)

I really like the idea of a Retrospective type though. We don't do them very often but its a great idea.

we used to have more changes types but it moved to generating to many questions about "What do I select for this scenario" so we narrowed it down and people seem to like it much better. Similar to the keep it simple stupid approach.

Over the years I've learned my companies behavior quite well and have made drastic improvements for CM to be accommodating but strict where it counts (basically cutting the fat). Having a bunch of change types I found to be "fat".
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> Change Management All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003

Forums ©


Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.