Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· Content
· FAQ
· Feedback
· News
· Search
· Statistics
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your_Account

THE ITIL BOOKS

The five ITIL books can be obtained directly from the publisher's website:
HERE

Or as downloadable PDFs: HERE

Current Membership

Latest: IrishGil
New Today: 2
New Yesterday: 82
Overall: 220699

People Online:
Visitors: 154
Members: 1
Total: 155 .

Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Resources

Service related resources
Service Level Agreement
Outsourcing

Note: ITIL is a registered trademark of OGC. This portal is totally independent and is in no way related to them. See our Feedback Page for more information.


Search



Languages
Select Interface Language:


Advertising
Please contact us via the feedback page to discuss advertising rates.

The Itil Community Forum: Forums

ITIL :: View topic - Problem Management & Risk
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Problem Management & Risk

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> ITIL Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
snertos999
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Aug 07, 2017
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2017 12:43 am    Post subject: Problem Management & Risk Reply with quote

1st post, please be kind!
I working as the Problem policy lead for a large public sector organisation in Wales. (As well as other Service Management duties)
I am in the process of reviewing and updating the statuses we currently use with the help of a stakeholder group drawn from across the organisation.

One of the statuses I want to remove is 'Approved Risk' which tends to be used when a proposed fix for a Problem is put on hold. (Usually for resource reasons)
I don't personally see it as a true Problem lifecycle status as the true status of the Problem is being 'masked' by selecting this.

There is currently a Risk field selectable within the Problem record itself which has risk types such as Clinical, Business & Organisational etc but there is no risk score attached to this selection.

My take on risk is that there is a potential for something to go awry and if it does, this then becomes an issue.
If you are logging a reactive Problem, surely the risk is now an issue as it has happened already.
I understand the argument for selecting a risk type and score if you are logging a proactive Problem record as the risk has not yet been realised (Issue)

Any advice and guidance greatly appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile
UKVIKING
Senior Itiler


Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: 3581
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2017 4:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

First. how are you using Problem management
If you are following ITIL standards, then PM comes in two aspects

1 - Reactive PM - where there is an unknown root cause of a or multiple incidents that needs to be investigated
2 - Proactive PM - find all the weak links in the IT Structure including SPoF

PM is really only concerned with identifying the unknown cause; thereby, solution development or build is not really PM per se

For example, the issue may be the OS on the particular hardware; so once that is identified; then some one else has to decide if the OS gets upgraded if the HW can support then OS or merely live with the issue.

You need to state in the PM policy the following

_ what work that the team or resources can do
_ create a triage / problem record acceptance of things.
_ what does not get done and a review process

the last will deal with the resource issue

Frankly, PM does not care about the risk per se

Service Level Management does
_________________
John Hardesty
ITSM Manager's Certificate (Red Badge)

Change Management is POWER & CONTROL. /....evil laughter
Back to top
View user's profile
snertos999
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Aug 07, 2017
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 8:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the advice John.
Yes we do follow ITIL and are an accredited ISO 20000 organisation.
I am trying to mature the process, particularly the proactive side of Problem Management.
I see your point regarding Risk. The responsibility for this should pass to another part of the business, possibly the Risk management group and/or senior management if there is a Critical Problem that requires resourcing to resolve through Change management.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ITIL Forum Index -> ITIL Discussion All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

 

Logos/trademarks property of respective owner. Comments property of poster. Rest 2004 Itil Community for Service Management & Foundation Certification. SV
Site source copyright (c)2003, and is Free Software under the GNU / GPL licence. All Rights Are Reserved.